The basic two-piece toilet comprises a different tank and bowl. However, the one-piece can have the tank shaped with the bowl as one entire unit.
You can differentiate by taking a gander at the joint between the tank and the bowl. A good crease is evident on the two-piece can, and there’s none for the one-piece can.
So what are the favorable circumstances and drawbacks of the two developments?
The fundamental bit of leeway of the two-piece configuration is you can supplant the tank and bowl independently. On the off chance that the tank is broken, you need to substitute the tank similarly for the bowl.
Be that as it may, on the off chance that you broke either part of a one-piece can, you should supplant the entire latrine. This is the main downside of the one-piece can, other than expense.
Moreover, since the tank is combined with the bowl, there is no compelling reason to make arrangements to help the tank. This is where some space can be spared and make the general development increasingly minimal, which clarifies why the more significant part of the space saver toilets is of the one-piece plan.
Other than looking extraordinary, one piece can be exceptionally simple to clean and keep up. That is the best advantage, most importantly.